Ordinance Establishing Youth Protection Measures

Expressed opposition to the youth curfew, arguing youth were not consulted and asking for investments in programs rather than restrictions.

Argued that the curfew addresses symptoms rather than root causes of youth struggles, calling for support services and safe spaces.

Criticized the curfew approach and police interactions with teens, questioning why the proposal was advanced without true community co-creation.

Noted that court and justice involvement increases recidivism and urged investments in youth potential rather than criminalization.

Voiced concern over ambiguity and potential biased enforcement of the curfew, calling for fully funded recreation centers instead.

Supported the curfew, emphasizing parental responsibility and accountability for children roaming the streets late at night.

Supported a curfew focused on parental accountability but criticized the police presentation and noted curfews won't stop serious crime.

Argued the curfew is unconstitutional and infringes on civil liberties and freedom of movement.

Expressed support for the youth curfew and religious freedom, stating lack of programs does not excuse committing crimes.