O
Winston-Salem
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Proposed Hyperscale Data Center in Rural Hall

Winston-Salem

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (6)

At a glance

Public comments
8
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 11, 2026.

Public comments (8)

SupportiveMichael FoessJun 11, 2026

Presented the project as a vital national security and economic investment, noting extensive community engagement and voluntary noise/cooling concessions.

Planning Board (City-County) (Regular) - Jun 11, 2026 · 1:40:18 →
SupportiveNathan WrightJun 11, 2026

Expressed support for the rezoning proposal.

Planning Board (City-County) (Regular) - Jun 11, 2026 · 1:25:42 →
OpposedCarol NewsomeJun 11, 2026

Argued against the project, stating it violates the Forward 2045 plan and harms the rural character of the community.

Planning Board (City-County) (Regular) - Jun 11, 2026 · 1:27:31 →
OpposedJames WoodardJun 11, 2026

Stated the project violates the Rural Hall Area Plan update, which discourages industrial encroachment on neighborhoods.

Planning Board (City-County) (Regular) - Jun 11, 2026 · 1:31:36 →
OpposedJonathan KislingberryJun 11, 2026

Raised concerns about persistent noise, incorrect zoning classification as Services A, and massive buildings dwarfing nearby homes.

Planning Board (City-County) (Regular) - Jun 11, 2026 · 1:37:21 →
OpposedRobin SmithJun 11, 2026

Warned about 24/7 low-frequency noise and health impacts on nearby residents, especially children and the elderly.

Planning Board (City-County) (Regular) - Jun 11, 2026 · 1:46:28 →
OpposedCharles SessionJun 11, 2026

Urged the board to honor zoning rules and protect the community's established identity.

Planning Board (City-County) (Regular) - Jun 11, 2026 · 1:49:48 →
OpposedUlrike WeithausJun 11, 2026

Highlighted potential threats to the historic AME Zion chapel from noise interrupting worship and risks near a butane switching yard.

Planning Board (City-County) (Regular) - Jun 11, 2026 · 1:51:54 →